AQAR-Criteria II

2.1.1 Due consideration is given to equity and inclusiveness by providing reservation of seats.
2.1.2 Student Demand Ratio, applicable to programs where State / Central Common Entrance Tests are not conducted.
2.1.3 Student enrollment pattern and student profile.

2.2.1. The Institution assesses the learning levels of the students after admission and organizes special programs for advanced learners and slow performers.
2.2.2 Student – Full-time teacher ratio (data for the preceding academic year).

2.3.1 Student-centric methods used for enhanced learning
2.3.2 Has provision for the use of Clinical Skills Laboratory and Simulation-Based Learning
2.3.3 Teachers use ICT-enabled tools for effective teaching and learning process, including online e-resources
2.3.4 Student :Mentor Ratio (preceding academic year)

2.4.1 Average percentage of fulltime teachers against sanctioned posts during the last five years.
2.4.2 Average percentage of full-time teachers with Ph.D./D.Sc./D.Lit./DM/M Ch/DNB in super specialties/other PG degrees (like MD/ MS/ MDS etc.,) in Health Sciences for recognition as Ph.D. guides as per the eligibility criteria stipulated by the Regulatory Councils / Universities during the last five years
2.4.3 Average Teaching experience of fulltime teachers in a number of years (preceding academic year)
2.4.4 Average percentage of teachers trained for the development and delivery of e-contents / e-courses/video lectures/demonstrations during the last 5 years.
2.4.5 Average Percentage of full-time teachers who received awards and recognitions for excellence in teaching, student mentoring, scholarships, professional achievements, and academic leadership at State, National, International levels from Government / Government-recognized agencies / registered professional associations/academies during the last five years.

2.5.1 Average number of days from the date of last semester-end/year-end examination to the date of declaration of results during the last five years.
2.5.2 Average percentage of student complaints/grievances about evaluation against the total number of students who appeared in the examinations during the last five years.
2.5.3 Evaluation-related Grievance Redressal mechanism followed by the Institution.
2.5.4 Reforms in the process and procedure in the conduct of evaluation/examination; including Continuous Internal Assessment to improve the examination system.
2.5.5 Status of automation of Examination division using Examination Management System (EMS) along with approved online Examination Manual.

2.6.1 The Institution has stated learning outcomes /graduate attributes as per the provisions of Regulatory bodies which are integrated into the assessment process and widely publicized through the website and other documents.
2.6.2 Incremental performance in Pass percentage of final year students in the last five years.